Menu
- Adloff, F. (2006). Beyond interests and norms: Toward a theory of gift-giving and reciprocity in modern societies. Constellations,13(3), 407–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Adloff, F., & Mau, S. (Eds.). (2005). Vom Geben und Nehmen. Zur Soziologie der Reziprozität. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.Google Scholar
- Bataille, G. (2001/1988). The accursed share: An essay on general economy. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
- Baudrillard, J. (2003). The spirit of terrorism and other essays. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Blackburn, S. (2003). Ethics. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of judgment (9th Ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1990). Logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1996). The work of time. In A. Komter (Ed.), The gift. An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 135–148). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1997). Marginalia—some additional notes on the gift. In A. Schrift (Ed.), The logic of the gift. Toward an ethic of generosity (pp. 231–245). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (2001). Pascalian mediations. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (2003). Practical reasons. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). Invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Caillé, A. (1989). Crise de la raison utilitaire. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
- Caillé, A. (2001). The double inconceivability of the pure gift. Angelaki,6(2), 23–39.Google Scholar
- Caputo, J. D. (1997). The prayers and tears of Jacques Derrida. Indiana University Press, esp. chap. 4.Google Scholar
- Caputo, J. (2003a). Derrida and Marion: Two Husserlian revolutions. In J. Bloechl (Ed.), Religious experience and the end of metaphysics (pp. 119–134). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
- Caputo, J. (2003b). Apostles of the impossible: Derrida and Marion. In J. D. Caputo & M. J. Scanlon (Eds.), God, the gift and postmodernism (pp. 185–222). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- Carnap, R. (1959). The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language. In J. Alfred (Ed.), Logical positivism (pp. 60–81). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Derrida, J. (1992). Given time. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Derrida, J. (1995). The gift of death. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Derrida, J. (2002). Acts of religion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Derrida, J. (2007). A certain impossible possibility. Critical Inquiry, 33(2), 441–461.Google Scholar
- Derrida, J., & Marion, J.-L. (1999). “On the gift: A discussion between Jacques Derrida and Jean-Luc Marion”, moderated by Richard Kearney. In J. D. Caputo & M. Scanlon (Eds.), Of God, the gift, and postmodernism (pp. 54–78). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- DiMaggio, Paul. (1979). Review essay: On Pierre Bourdieu. American Journal of Sociology,84, 1460–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heyd, D. (1982). Supererogation: Its status in ethical theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Heyd, D. (2005). Supererogatory giving. In B. Sharson & J. Joerden (Eds.), Philosophia Practica Universalis (pp. 149-165). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
- Heyd, D. (2005b). Supererogatory giving: Can Derrida’s circle be broken? In B. Sharon, B. Byrd, & J. C. Joerden (Eds.), Philosophia Practica Universalis. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
- Heyd, D. (2006). Supererogation. In Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy, available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supererogation.
- Kierkegaard, S. (1983). Fear and trembling. Repetition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Komter, A. (2005). Social solidarity and the gift. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Lévi-Strauss, C. (1968). Structural anthropology. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
- Marion, J. L. (1991). God without being. Cambridge: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Marion, J.-L. (1998). Reduction and givenness: Investigations of Husserl, Heidegger and Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
- Marion, J.-L. (1999). The other first philosophy and the question of givenness. Critical Inquiry,25(199), 784–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marion, J.-L. (2002). Being given. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Mauss, M. (1990). The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Poupeau, F., & Discepolo, T. (2004). Scholarship with commitment: On the political engagements of Pierre Bourdieu. Constellations,11(1), 76–96.Google Scholar
- Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, history, forgetting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ricoeur, P. (2005). Parcours de la Reconnaissance. Paris: Éditions Stock.Google Scholar
- Sherwood, Y., & Hart, K. (Eds.). (2005). Derrida and religion. Other testaments. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Smart, A. (2000). Gifts, bribes, and guanxi: A reconsideration of Bourdieu’s social capital. In: D. Robbins (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
- Smelser, N. J., & Swedberg, R. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Titmuss, R. (1973). The gift relationship. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Topper, K. (2001). Not so trifling nuances: Pierre Bourdieu, symbolic violence, and the perversions of democracy. Constellations,8(1), 30–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ungureanu, C. (2008). Derrida on free decision: Between Habermas’ discursivism and Schmitt’s decisionism. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 3/2008, 293–325.Google Scholar
- Ungureanu, C. (2012) El gusto del extremado: Baudrillard and Derrida sobre el terror y el terrorismo. In ISEGORIA. Revista de filosofía política, 4, 101–133.Google Scholar
- Wacquant, L. (2004). Pointers on Pierre Bourdieu and democratic politics. Constellations,11(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida begins by analysing an all too familiar phenomenon, namely trembling, which originates from a mysterious and unknowable alterity. Affirming singularity and solitude via mysterium tremendum, he then investigates the notions of sacrifice. The Christian themes can be seen to revolve around the gift as gift of death, the fathomless gift of a type of death: infinite love (the Good as goodness that infinitely forgets itself), sin and salvation, repentance and sacrifice.
- Arroyo C. (2005) Unselfish salvation: Levinas, Kierkegaard, and the place of self-fulfillment in ethics. Faith and Philosophy 22.2: 160–172Google Scholar
- Derrida, J. (1978). Violence and metaphysics. Writing and difference (A. Bass, Trans.) (pp. 79–153; 111). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Derrida J. (1992) How to avoid speaking: Denials. In: Coward H., Foshay T. (eds) Derrida and negative theology. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
- Derrida J. (1994) Given time I: Counterfeit money (P. Kamuf, Trans.). Chicago, University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
- Derrida J. (1996) The gift of death (D. Wills, Trans.). The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Derrida J. (2002) Force of law: The ‘mystical foundation of authority’. In: Anidjar G. (eds) Acts of religion. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- De Vries H. (1999) Philosophy and the turn to religion. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- De Vries H. (2002) Religion and violence: Philosophical perspectives from Kant to Derrida. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- Gasché R. (2007) European memories: Jan Patocka and Jacques Derrida on responsibility. Critical Inquiry 33: 291–311 305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goiocoechea D. (1999) The moment of responsibility (Derrida and Kierkegaard). Philosophy Today 43.4: 210–225Google Scholar
- Hanson, J. (Forthcoming). At the limits of religion without religion: A problem that cannot be resolved. Philosophy Today.Google Scholar
- Larrea A. (2007) Anxious responsibility: Derrida’s appropriation of Kierkegaardian ‘fear and trembling’. In: Sharpe M., Noonan M., Freddi J. (eds) Trauma, history, philosophy: With feature essays by Agnes Heller and György Márkus. Newcastle, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp 76–101Google Scholar
- Levinas E. (1998) Otherwise than being or beyond essence (A. Lingis, Trans.). Duquesne University Press, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
- Lippitt J. (2003) Routledge philosophy guidebook to Kierkegaard and Fear and Trembling. Routledge, New York, pp 135–137Google Scholar
- Milbank J. (1995) Can a gift be given? Prolegomena to a future trinitarian metaphysic. Modern Theology 11.1: 119–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Milbank J. (1999) The ethics of self-sacrifice. First Things 91: 33–38Google Scholar
- Turner D. (1998) The art of unknowing: Negative theology in late medieval mysticism. Modern Theology 14.4: 473–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Westphal M. (2008) Levinas and Kierkegaard in dialogue. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
- Wood D. (1997) Much obliged. Philosophy Today 41.2: 135–140Google Scholar